25 buyer questions × 4 models

AI search visibility tool for mentions, citations, and share of voice

See where AI overlooks your brand, which competitors appear instead, and which sources shape the answer. One frozen benchmark produces 100 planned answers and keeps the evidence attached.

By Kyle, product maintainer and editorPublished Product facts and pricing are shared with checkout.
View sample report

First-purchase price. No subscription. Results are directional and do not guarantee future placement.

  • 25 buyer questions
  • Four web-grounded providers
  • Competitor comparison
  • Answer and citation evidence
  • Five prioritized actions
  • PDF and CSV exports
Sample AI visibility report showing metrics, provider coverage, competitor evidence, and prioritized actions
Full report visible without signupOpen report

What the report separates

One score cannot explain why a brand is missing

The illustrative values below show how a report keeps mentions, citations, competitor share of voice, and provider coverage distinct. Every result links back to the stored question, answer, and sources.

Mentions

28 / 80

Illustrative neutral discovery answers that name the brand.

Owned citations

12 / 80

Illustrative eligible answers citing the claimed domain.

Share of voice

31%

Illustrative target mentions divided by tracked brand mentions.

Coverage

94 / 100

Illustrative planned answers that finished with usable evidence.

The 25 × 4 method

One question set, four grounded provider views

  1. 01

    Freeze 25 buyer questions

    Use 20 neutral discovery questions and five brand-named diagnostics. Lock the wording, market, competitors, and collection conditions.

  2. 02

    Send the same set to four providers

    OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and Grok each receive the identical questions through model APIs with web grounding.

  3. 03

    Preserve up to 100 answer records

    Store the answer text, source URLs, brand mentions, prominence, competitor evidence, timestamp, model identifier, and eligibility status.

  4. 04

    Turn gaps into five actions

    Connect missed buyer questions, recurring competitors, and cited-source patterns to technical, content, or authority work.

Tool vs manual prompt testing

Automate the audit trail, not the judgment

Decision factorManual prompt test100 Questions benchmark
CostFree except for team time$9 first audit; no subscription
CollectionCopy prompts and answers by hand25 frozen questions sent through one shared four-provider harness
EvidenceOnly as complete as the worksheetAnswers, sources, models, timestamps, failures, and eligibility stored together
ScoringBuild and maintain formulas manuallyMentions, prominence, share of voice, citations, sentiment, and coverage
Best useA small exploratory spot checkA client-ready baseline or comparable before-and-after rerun

Prefer a manual workflow? Use the free ChatGPT brand visibility test and prompt-tracking spreadsheet. The measurement definitions are public either way.

Frozen benchmark, not rank tracking

Repeat the same test after meaningful work

Permanent rank tracking implies one stable position. AI answers are composed from changing model, prompt, source, market, and time conditions. 100 Questions freezes the test so the conditions are inspectable.

Use the first audit as a directional baseline. Ship a meaningful technical, content, or authority change, allow time for recrawling, then rerun the identical questions. Compare the stored evidence—not just two composite scores.

Choose the right model

Best for a bounded audit, not an always-on dashboard

Use 100 Questions for

  • A point-in-time baseline before an AI visibility project
  • A client-ready audit with inspectable answer and citation evidence
  • A like-for-like rerun after meaningful technical, content, or authority work

Choose continuous tracking when

  • It is not continuous monitoring and does not send daily alerts.
  • It does not currently test Perplexity or reproduce consumer chat interfaces.
  • It is a directional 25-question sample, not a statistically representative market ranking.

Build a defensible benchmark

Understand every input before you buy

AEO vs GEO

Choose the optimization lens and the metric that belongs to it.

Before you run an audit

AI search visibility tool questions

What is an AI search visibility tool?

An AI search visibility tool measures whether and how a brand appears when AI systems answer relevant questions. Useful tools preserve the questions, provider conditions, answers, sources, competitors, and failures behind each metric instead of reporting an unexplained score.

Which AI models does 100 Questions test?

Each audit sends the same 25-question set to OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and Grok through model APIs with web grounding, creating 100 planned answers. It does not currently test Perplexity or reproduce personalized consumer chat interfaces.

Is this an AI rank tracker?

No. It is a frozen, point-in-time benchmark designed for a baseline and comparable reruns after meaningful work. Choose a continuous tracker when you need daily or weekly prompts, alerts, trend lines, or always-on multi-project reporting.

How much does the AI visibility audit cost?

The introductory first audit costs $9. The normal single-audit price after the first purchase is $15, with prepaid three- and ten-audit packages. There is no subscription, and credits remain valid for 12 months.

Can I see an AI visibility report before buying?

Yes. The complete sample report is public and requires no account. It shows the question set, provider coverage, mentions, citations, competitors, share of voice, limitations, stored evidence, and five prioritized actions.

Does the tool guarantee future AI mentions or citations?

No. Results are a time-stamped, directional API-grounded sample. Answers vary by provider, model, search results, prompt, market, and time, so the benchmark cannot guarantee a future mention, citation, recommendation, or ranking.

One prepaid benchmark

Find the buyer questions where AI overlooks your brand.

Run 25 frozen questions across four grounded providers and keep the evidence behind every result.